A well-built structure will often stand out as an especially solid- and simple-seeming thing, but appearances of those kinds will always conceal a lot of underlying complexity. Even putting up a relatively small building will inevitably involve drawing on expertise that spans a number of different disciplines, from architecture and engineering to the nuts and bolts of framing, concrete pouring, and finishing. Construction Law is therefore a complex field of its own, both because it cuts across so many different areas of expertise and because of the depth so common to each of these. Practices like the robertson firm that take on cases of these kinds are often called upon to master many different types of subjects in the course of doing so.
There are many different kinds of disputes that regularly arise with regard to construction law, but a few stand out as being especially common. With millions of dollars on the line, for instance, commercial construction projects that result in obvious failures can easily give rise to legal challenges and accusations among those involved.
When construction defects of these scales are made apparent, assigning blame will often not be a simple matter at all. Even in cases where the symptoms are as obvious as cracks that appear visibly in concrete, investigation will often reveal real reasons for the apparently culpable party to make a case for others actually being at fault.
Between that fact and the size of the stakes that are often involved, issues of these kinds rarely result in easy, amicable settlements right from the start. Instead, it will be far more common for a legal process of at least a fair amount of complexity and contention to arise thereafter, until a successful resolution can be made.
This will often involve delving deeply into subjects as varied as the contracts that prevailed throughout a construction project, the architectural plans that were created, and the daily minutiae of work performed by contractors. As each party to a dispute seeks to shore up its argument with even more detail and findings, cases will often come to seem even more complex, as a result.
Even when that does happen, this is not to say that a long battle in the courtroom is invariably to follow. In fact, mutually agreeable settlements can be achieved at any stage of the process, with at least one side realizing that this will be less costly and more productive than pushing things any further. Just as a simple-looking building might have arisen from some surprisingly complex construction processes, so can related legal complexity sometimes be resolved in surprisingly straightforward ways.